PCI DSS Compliance for UK Businesses: What Merchants Need to Know in 2026
Published - 06 April 2017
Revised - 26 August 2026


Libby James is the founder and Managing Director of Merchant Advice Service. Since 2016, she has worked directly with businesses and payment providers across merchant accounts, card processing, payment gateways and complex provider requirements.
Libby specialises in high-risk, declined and harder-to-place merchants, as well as businesses requiring specialist payment methods, integrations or international support. She writes and reviews Merchant Advice Service content, drawing on practical experience gained from real merchant enquiries and provider relationships.
If your business accepts card payments, PCI DSS is part of your payment-security responsibilities.
But the amount of work involved depends heavily on how your business takes payments.
A retailer using standalone card terminals, an ecommerce merchant redirecting customers to a hosted payment page and an enterprise business capturing payment data through its own API do not have the same PCI environment.
One of the biggest misconceptions is:
“Our payment provider is PCI compliant, so we do not need to do anything.”
That is not necessarily correct.
Outsourcing payment processing can substantially reduce the systems and card data within your PCI DSS scope, but PCI SSC states that merchants still retain responsibilities when payment processing is outsourced.
The more useful question is:
“Where can payment account data enter, move through or be affected by our systems — and what PCI DSS responsibilities does that create?”
This guide explains PCI DSS v4.0.1 for UK businesses, including ecommerce, hosted checkout, embedded payment forms, APIs, card terminals, telephone payments, stored cards, third-party providers and the latest ecommerce security requirements.
PCI DSS is the Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard.
It is a global payment-security standard designed to protect payment account data.
The PCI Security Standards Council develops and maintains the standard.
The current standard is PCI DSS v4.0.1.
PCI DSS v4.0 was retired at the end of 2024, leaving v4.0.1 as the current supported version.
View the current PCI DSS documents from PCI SSC.
PCI DSS is an industry security standard rather than a standalone UK Act of Parliament.
The PCI Security Standards Council develops the standard but does not itself enforce merchant compliance.
Payment brands, acquiring banks and other organisations responsible for compliance programmes determine how merchants are expected to validate and report compliance.
PCI SSC refers to these organisations as compliance-accepting entities.
Read PCI SSC guidance on compliance-accepting entities.
Do not treat PCI DSS as a certificate that sits independently from your payment setup.
Your acquiring provider, payment architecture and the way card data interacts with your business determine much of the practical compliance journey.
Yes.
PCI SSC states that PCI DSS is intended for entities involved in payment processing, including merchants, regardless of size or transaction volume.
What varies is the merchant's environment and the way compliance must be validated.
A small merchant using a simple outsourced payment setup may have a much smaller compliance scope than a large merchant operating its own payment infrastructure.
See PCI SSC guidance for smaller merchants.
This is probably the most important misconception to correct.
A business may use:
Outsourcing card-data processing can significantly reduce the merchant's PCI DSS scope.
But PCI SSC states that outsourcing all payment-processing operations does not remove the merchant's responsibility entirely.
Merchants can still be responsible for matters including:
Read PCI SSC's guidance on outsourced payment processing.
The words “we take payments online” are not enough to establish PCI scope.
You need to understand how the payment actually works.
| Payment model | What happens | PCI consideration |
|---|---|---|
| Hosted redirect | Customer leaves or is redirected from the merchant site to a payment-provider-controlled payment page | Card-data functions may be largely outsourced, but the merchant can still retain PCI responsibilities |
| Embedded provider iframe | Payment-provider-controlled fields appear inside the merchant website | Can potentially qualify for SAQ A if all eligibility criteria are met, but ecommerce webpage security requirements still matter |
| Direct Post | Merchant webpage creates part of the payment page and card data posts to the payment provider | Can create greater merchant involvement and potentially a different SAQ |
| Merchant API integration | Merchant systems directly interact with cardholder data/payment APIs | Potentially much broader PCI DSS scope |
| Payment link | Customer accesses a payment page supplied by the provider | Can substantially outsource payment-data handling, depending on implementation |
| Card terminal | Card data is captured through physical payment equipment | Scope depends on terminal, environment and payment architecture |
| Virtual terminal / MOTO | Staff enter customer card information into a provider system | Staff, devices and card-data handling can affect PCI requirements |
| Stored cards | Payment credentials are retained or tokenised for later transactions | Responsibility depends on who stores the underlying account data and how the tokenisation architecture works |
This table is illustrative rather than a determination of which Self-Assessment Questionnaire applies to a particular merchant.
Businesses should confirm their specific validation requirements with their acquiring provider or relevant compliance-accepting entity.
A Self-Assessment Questionnaire, usually shortened to SAQ, is one of the tools used by eligible merchants to assess and report PCI DSS compliance.
There are different SAQs for different payment environments.
PCI SSC states that all of the eligibility criteria for a particular SAQ must be met before that questionnaire can be used.
Read PCI SSC's explanation of Self-Assessment Questionnaires.
There is no single SAQ for every merchant.
Common merchant SAQ categories include:
Which one applies depends on factors including:
PCI SSC recommends consulting the acquiring bank/payment brand or other compliance-accepting entity to confirm which SAQ should be used.
See PCI SSC guidance on choosing an SAQ.
Do not select an SAQ simply because another business that looks similar uses it.
Small technical differences in checkout architecture can create materially different PCI DSS requirements.
SAQ A is designed for eligible card-not-present merchants whose account-data functions are outsourced to PCI DSS compliant third parties and who meet all of the relevant SAQ A eligibility criteria.
It can apply to ecommerce and certain mail-order/telephone-order environments.
For ecommerce, the precise architecture matters.
PCI SSC states that to meet relevant SAQ A payment-page criteria, payment-page elements used to capture payment data must originate from compliant third-party providers rather than the merchant's own environment.
See PCI SSC guidance on SAQ A and SAQ A-EP eligibility.
A hosted redirect sends the customer from the merchant environment to a payment page controlled by a third-party payment provider.
An iframe allows payment-provider-controlled payment fields to appear inside the merchant's webpage.
Both can potentially reduce merchant exposure to cardholder data compared with directly collecting card details.
However, the security considerations are not identical.
PCI SSC specifically distinguishes between:
See PCI SSC guidance on Direct Post, iframe and redirect implementations.
PCI DSS v4.0.1 introduced a stronger focus on ecommerce payment-page security.
From 2025, new requirements around payment-page scripts and unauthorised changes became effective within PCI DSS v4.x.
For merchants validating using SAQ A, PCI SSC subsequently revised the questionnaire so that relevant merchants must confirm that their ecommerce site is not susceptible to script attacks that could affect the merchant's ecommerce systems.
This is particularly relevant where a payment-provider form or iframe is embedded within a merchant-controlled webpage.
PCI SSC states that relevant merchants can address the SAQ A eligibility criterion through appropriate techniques or through confirmation from the PCI DSS compliant provider supplying the embedded payment page/form, subject to the published conditions.
Read PCI SSC FAQ 1588 on ecommerce scripts.
This is an important point for businesses that believe a hosted payment setup means vulnerability scanning cannot apply to them.
In June 2026, PCI SSC clarified that PCI DSS v4.x SAQ A includes requirements for external vulnerability scanning by a PCI SSC Approved Scanning Vendor for merchant ecommerce webpages.
PCI SSC states that this can apply even where:
The reasoning is that compromise of the merchant's webpage could potentially interfere with the payment journey even where payment processing itself is outsourced.
Read PCI SSC's June 2026 ASV guidance for SAQ A merchants.
ASV stands for Approved Scanning Vendor.
An ASV is a company approved by PCI SSC to perform the external vulnerability scans required in relevant PCI DSS environments.
Whether and how scans are required depends on the merchant's specific validation requirements.
A criminal does not necessarily need direct access to the PSP's infrastructure to attack the payment journey.
If the merchant's website is compromised, malicious code could potentially:
This is one reason modern PCI DSS places greater emphasis on the security of ecommerce pages and scripts.
A hosted ecommerce platform or PSP can significantly reduce the amount of cardholder data handled directly by your business.
That can be extremely valuable.
However, saying:
“Our provider is PCI compliant”
is not the same as saying:
“Our business has no PCI responsibilities.”
The merchant still needs to understand:
Face-to-face merchants have different payment environments from ecommerce merchants.
The PCI scope can depend on:
P2PE stands for Point-to-Point Encryption.
A validated PCI P2PE solution can reduce the merchant's PCI DSS scope by encrypting account data from the point where the card is captured through to the secure decryption environment.
However, simply saying a terminal uses “encryption” does not necessarily mean the merchant is using a PCI-listed P2PE solution.
The specific solution and implementation need to be checked.
MOTO means Mail Order / Telephone Order.
Telephone payments can create additional PCI considerations because staff may hear or handle card details.
Questions include:
A virtual terminal supplied by a PCI-compliant provider does not automatically remove the merchant's responsibilities around the people, devices and processes used to access it.
Payment links can be useful where a merchant currently asks customers to provide card details over the telephone or email.
Instead, the merchant can send the customer to a payment page controlled by the payment provider.
This can reduce the need for staff to handle payment account data directly.
But the merchant should still check:
Email is generally an inappropriate way to collect payment-card information.
If customers regularly send card details by email, the merchant should review the underlying payment journey and provide a more secure payment method.
Payment links, hosted checkout and properly designed payment interfaces can often provide safer alternatives.
Many merchants need to retain the ability to charge customers again without asking them to re-enter a card every time.
Examples include:
Modern payment providers often use tokenisation so that the merchant can reference a payment credential without directly storing the underlying card number.
This can reduce exposure to cardholder data.
But the merchant should establish:
For migration issues, see our guide to moving stored cards, tokens and recurring payments.
A bespoke API can give an established merchant greater control over:
But the PCI implications depend on what data merchant systems actually touch.
If payment account data enters merchant-controlled:
the compliance environment can become substantially more complex.
PCI DSS scope should therefore be considered before payment architecture is built rather than after integration is complete.
See our Payment API Integration guide for the wider architecture considerations.
Payment APIs create large quantities of technical data.
Developers should ensure sensitive payment information is not unintentionally captured in:
PCI DSS scope is not limited to the checkout page itself.
Merchants increasingly depend on several third parties within the payment environment.
These can include:
PCI SSC states that outsourcing does not remove the merchant's responsibility to understand the relevant third-party relationships.
This includes establishing which provider is responsible for which controls.
Security marketing language and PCI DSS validation are different things.
Where provider PCI status is relevant to the merchant's assessment, obtain appropriate evidence and understand:
PCI DSS protects payment-account data and the systems that store, process, transmit or can affect its security.
3D Secure is an authentication protocol used within ecommerce card payments.
Strong Customer Authentication is a separate regulatory requirement applying to relevant electronic payments under UK payment rules.
They can interact within the same checkout, but:
PCI DSS compliance does not mean SCA is satisfied.
and:
using 3D Secure does not mean PCI DSS is satisfied.
No security standard can guarantee that fraud or disputes will disappear.
PCI DSS is primarily concerned with protecting payment account data and the security of the payment environment.
Merchants may still need separate controls for:
Businesses may encounter references to merchant PCI levels based on transaction volumes.
However, merchants should be cautious about relying on an old generic “Level 1 to Level 4” table copied from historic guidance.
PCI SSC states that payment brands and acquirers manage their own compliance-validation programmes.
Those organisations determine matters including:
The correct approach is therefore to confirm current validation requirements with the relevant acquirer or payment brand rather than relying solely on a generic transaction-volume chart.
See PCI SSC guidance on compliance validation.
A Report on Compliance, usually abbreviated to ROC, is a formal report used for certain PCI DSS assessments.
Not every merchant completes a ROC.
Whether a merchant must validate through a ROC, SAQ or another process is determined by the applicable compliance programme and merchant circumstances.
An Attestation of Compliance, or AOC, records the outcome of a PCI DSS assessment.
AOCs exist for different assessment types.
The merchant should follow the submission requirements specified by its acquiring provider/payment brand or other compliance-accepting entity.
Changing PSP or acquirer does not automatically make the merchant more or less PCI compliant.
The important question is:
Does the payment architecture change?
If one fully hosted payment page is replaced by another similar architecture, the merchant's PCI environment may remain broadly similar, subject to the specific implementations.
The merchant becomes more involved in the payment page, which can change PCI requirements.
If merchant systems begin handling payment account data directly, PCI scope can increase substantially.
Redesigning the architecture may reduce the amount of card data touching merchant systems.
For the dedicated migration discussion, see How Does PCI Compliance Work When Changing Your Card Processor?
When businesses compare processors, they often focus on:
PCI architecture should sit alongside those considerations.
Ask each shortlisted provider:
Before comparing payment technology, we would ask six questions.
Does the customer enter payment information directly into provider-controlled infrastructure, or does merchant technology capture any part of it?
Consider websites, servers, plugins, APIs, EPOS, call-centre systems and employee devices.
Is the underlying account data stored by the merchant, PSP, vault provider or another third party?
Identify payment processors, gateways, hosting companies, software providers and other suppliers that can affect payment security.
Confirm the correct SAQ, scans, ROC or other requirements with the acquiring provider or applicable compliance-accepting entity.
Adding a new checkout, gateway, telephone-payment channel, subscription product or direct API can change PCI DSS scope.
The best way to reduce PCI complexity is often to design the payment architecture so unnecessary card data never enters the merchant environment in the first place.
| Question | Why it matters |
|---|---|
| Who hosts the payment fields? | Can materially affect ecommerce PCI scope |
| Does card data touch our systems? | Direct handling can increase PCI obligations |
| What SAQ may apply? | Helps understand the likely validation route, subject to acquirer confirmation |
| Are ASV scans required? | Current SAQ A ecommerce requirements can include external vulnerability scans |
| How are payment-page scripts protected? | Modern PCI DSS places greater emphasis on ecommerce script security |
| Who stores cards? | Important for PCI scope and future provider migration |
| How does tokenisation work? | Can reduce direct handling of underlying card data |
| What PCI evidence does the provider have? | Merchants need to understand third-party compliance |
| Who is responsible for each PCI control? | Outsourcing creates shared responsibilities rather than automatically eliminating them |
| What changes if we integrate through API? | Architecture changes can materially change scope |
Merchant Advice Service is not a Qualified Security Assessor and does not certify businesses as PCI DSS compliant.
However, PCI architecture is relevant when comparing payment providers because different payment integrations can create very different technical and operational requirements.
When reviewing a payment setup, we consider areas such as:
Merchants should confirm their formal PCI DSS scope and validation requirements with their acquiring provider, payment brand or appropriately qualified PCI professional.
For more about the MAS provider-selection process, see How Merchant Advice Service Works and How MAS Researches and Compares Payment Providers.
The official PCI SSC document library containing the current PCI Data Security Standard and related supporting materials.
PCI DSS v4.0.1 document library
Current guidance explaining that outsourcing card processing does not remove all merchant PCI DSS responsibilities.
PCI DSS and outsourced payment processing
Official guidance explaining SAQs, eligibility criteria and the role of acquiring providers/payment brands in determining validation requirements.
What is a PCI DSS Self-Assessment Questionnaire?
Current guidance on the SAQ A eligibility requirement concerning script-based attacks affecting ecommerce payment environments.
June 2026 guidance explaining external vulnerability scanning requirements for ecommerce webpages used by SAQ A merchants, including relevant redirect and iframe implementations.
Official guidance explaining the role of payment brands, acquiring providers and other compliance-accepting entities in determining PCI DSS validation and reporting requirements.
PCI SSC compliance validation guidance
Merchant Advice Service is an independent payments information, comparison and provider-matching service.
MAS may receive commission or a referral fee from some payment providers where a business chooses to proceed following an introduction. This does not determine the factual information, PCI DSS guidance or provider-selection principles included in this article.
Merchant Advice Service is not the PCI Security Standards Council and is not a Qualified Security Assessor.
PCI DSS scope and validation requirements depend on the merchant's individual payment environment and the requirements of the relevant payment brands, acquiring provider or other compliance-accepting entity.
The payment scenarios and SAQ descriptions in this guide are illustrative and should not be used as a definitive PCI DSS scope assessment.
Using a payment provider, hosted payment page, tokenisation service, gateway or ecommerce platform does not automatically eliminate a merchant's PCI DSS responsibilities.
Merchant Advice Service does not certify PCI DSS compliance and does not provide information-security, legal or regulatory assurance.
Businesses requiring formal assessment should consult their acquiring provider and, where appropriate, a Qualified Security Assessor or other appropriately qualified PCI professional.
PCI DSS information last checked: 26 August 2026
This guide provides general payment information and should not be treated as legal, regulatory, compliance, cybersecurity or technical advice.
Written or reviewed by Libby James, founder of Merchant Advice Service and specialist in merchant payments and complex provider requirements.